On Fri, 12.12.14 15:57, Matthias Urlichs (matth...@urlichs.de) wrote: > Hi, > > Colin Guthrie: > > What's the argument for including /usr/local in all this stuff? Feels > > wrong to me. > > > +ME_TOO. /usr/local frequently has wider permissions than reasonable for > something that can affect system startup. > > I can think of one argument in favor of this -- you can modify the system > default that way, without touching /etc, so this would add local > modifications to an image which you then use for system initialization. > > However, you can do the same thing by adding appropriate *.conf files to > /usr/lib/systemd/**.
/usr is OS vendor territory. /usr/local is admin territory. The admin should not modify /usr, ever. Lennart -- Lennart Poettering, Red Hat _______________________________________________ systemd-devel mailing list firstname.lastname@example.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel