On Wed, 04.02.15 02:05, Michael Biebl (mbi...@gmail.com) wrote:

> 2015-02-04 1:54 GMT+01:00 Lennart Poettering <lenn...@poettering.net>:
> > On Wed, 04.02.15 01:52, Michael Biebl (mbi...@gmail.com) wrote:
> >> Is this the same issue as
> >> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1002806#c20 ?
> >
> > Feels like it.
> >
> > It's not clear to me though why the bug was closed, i.e. what fix was
> > applied there...
> 
> We pulled a fix/workaround from the Fedora package [1] if my memory
> serves me well.
> If we could get rid of that and this is fixed upstream proper, that
> would be great.
> 
> Michael
> 
> 
> [1] 
> http://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/pkg-systemd/systemd.git/commit/debian/rules?id=8341218591c79b4fcfd2542b765b605faff8690b

That hack is actually not that ugly... Though incomplete since it will
only add refs to runlevel[1-5], but not 0,6...

But I still think the .wants symlinks from sysv-generator might be the
better hack to apply...

Lennart

-- 
Lennart Poettering, Red Hat
_______________________________________________
systemd-devel mailing list
systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel

Reply via email to