On Thu, Apr 2, 2015 at 8:18 PM, Lennart Poettering <lenn...@poettering.net> wrote: > On Thu, 02.04.15 15:51, Jan Janssen (medhe...@web.de) wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> On 2015-04-02 11:34, Lennart Poettering wrote: >> >On Thu, 26.03.15 16:09, Jan Janssen (medhe...@web.de) wrote: >> > >> >Heya, >> > >> >Hmm, so we already support passing special reboot() parameters, and >> >this is done by manipulating a file in /run, without introducing any >> >new targets. To me it appears that boot-into-firmware-setup is >> >something hat should be handled the same way, i.e. as a special >> >parameter for the *normal* poweroff path, instead of introducing a new >> >poweroff path for it. Of course, instead of manipulating /run for this >> >we should directly manipulate the respective EFI variable. >> > >> >I hence think this should be a new switch --firmware-setup or so to >> >systemctl. Of course, that sounds awfully specific and I don't really >> >like too much adding a new switch just for this flag, but it's the >> >least best option I see. >> >> That was my original approach. Kay said "--firmware" sounded weird. > > Yeah, he initially said that but 6 hours later suggested suggested > "--firmware" again.
No, I did not. The mail contains only references about the order of options. I dislike the global options for local verbs systemctl does, it is confusing even in the man page, and does not scale. Kay _______________________________________________ systemd-devel mailing list systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
