В Fri, 3 Apr 2015 14:04:10 +0200 Lennart Poettering <lenn...@poettering.net> пишет:
> On Thu, 02.04.15 16:28, Martin Pitt (martin.p...@ubuntu.com) wrote: > > > Lennart Poettering [2015-04-02 13:03 +0200]: > > > Yeah, and rightfully so. I mean, a service really should be able to > > > shutdown if dbus is dead. In fact, it should be able to shutdown in > > > pretty much any situation... > > > > They do, but that's irrelevant here. The problem is that dbus.service > > shuts down very early as nothing prevents it from that. All > > dependencies just refer to dbus.socket, but TBH socket (re-)activation > > totally doesn't work for dbus. > > systemd will not reactivate services when shutting down, we refuse to > go in circles... > Could you elaborate? systemd will obviously start services when starting shutdown.target. How does systemd differentiate between services that can and can not be started? _______________________________________________ systemd-devel mailing list systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
