Hi On Tue, Apr 7, 2015 at 3:47 AM, Peter Hutterer <peter.hutte...@who-t.net> wrote: > On Sat, Apr 04, 2015 at 02:07:27PM +0200, David Herrmann wrote: >> Hi >> >> On Fri, Apr 3, 2015 at 8:55 PM, Hans de Goede <hdego...@redhat.com> wrote: >> [...] >> >> I don't think we should return when we see INPUT_PROP_ACCEL. If a >> >> keyboard embeds an accelerometer, we will miss it. I think I went too >> >> deep in detail for Wacoms/tablets devices and it confused you. Those >> >> don't need much processing in udev, we can mostly control everything >> >> out the tree. >> > >> > >> > Ok, I'll respin my patch to not have the return then. >> >> What's the plan? Use INPUT_PROP_ACCEL as "negative check" (necessary >> negative condition) for touchpads and mice? And as fallback hint for >> accelerometer if nothing else matched? [...] > If we know that the x/y axes are accelerometers we know the device isn't a > touchpad, mouse, pointing stick or touchscreen.
The open question was whether this will remain true in the future. But I guess this assumption is pretty solid and we just ought to fix kernel drivers that feed multiple input streams into a single evdev device. So yeah, patch is fine with me. Thanks for pushing! David _______________________________________________ systemd-devel mailing list systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
