Hi! On 07/04/15 20:49, Lennart Poettering wrote: >>>>>> IFA_FLAGS seems to appear in kernel ~3.13 and the kernel requirements >>>>>>>>> > >>>> >> > from README state 3.8/3.7 at the moment. >>>>>>>>> > >>>> >> > >>>>>>>>> > >>>> >> > One could let the sd_rtnl_message_append_u32 for >>>>>>>>> > >>>> >> > IFA_FLAGS fail in patch >>>>>>>>> > >>>> >> > 2/3, but then user space has to play tricks with IPv6 >>>>>>>>> > >>>> >> > DHCPv6 routes as >>>>>>>>> > >>>> >> > before this patch and needs to re-add the code just >>>>>>>>> > >>>> >> > removed because of >>>>>>>>> > >>>> >> > this nice feature. Oh well... >>>>> > >> > I'm building against 3.19 at the moment. Just had no chance to >>>>> > >> > check what's >>> > > Oh, sorry, the headers are from 3.12, but that's still newer than 3.8 >>> > > in the doc... >>> > > >>>>> > >> > actually wrong, but your patch actually brakes compilation for me. >>>>> > >> > Toolchain >>>>> > >> > is gcc 4.9 custombuilt from buildroot. >> > >> > Got it, we just need documentation update or fallback define as Lennart >> > proposed :) > We usually try to support the kernels from the last two years in > systemd. That means 3.8 or 3.9 or so., right now. > > Hence we really should add the fallback define to missing.h.
But if the backend code for this flag appears first in Linux 3.14 (https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?id=479840ffdbe4), working around the compilation issue (against older uapi headers) will not help with the fact that networkd will fail in 851c9f82736 (systemd-networkd: Use IFA_F_NOPREFIXROUTE with IPv6 addresses)? Alex. _______________________________________________ systemd-devel mailing list systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
