On Thu, 2015-04-09 at 12:43 +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote: > Hmm, in general, we really should try to create the same binaries, > regardless if we are built on an old or new kernel. And the binaries > should work as good as possible, regardless which kernel version they > are running on. But with the change above the binary built on a newer > kernel work differently from an older kernel, even though we added the > definition to missing.h to make the distinction go away... > > Or in other words: we try to do runtime compat, not just compile time > compat, so that we don't strictly have to sync kernel and userspace > updated.
Hmm, I was suspecting that for a moment. I need to come up with a better runtime solution for version 2 of the patch then. Cheers, Patrik _______________________________________________ systemd-devel mailing list systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel