On Sun, Apr 12, 2015 at 1:49 AM, Shawn Landden <[email protected]> wrote: > Given that we don't do any operations on it (besides memcmp which doesn't > matter) > it doesn't actually violate, but it does generate an annoying warning.
What about making expected_chaddr a void pointer? Would that remove the warning? _______________________________________________ systemd-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
