Hi On Sun, Apr 19, 2015 at 11:46 PM, Matthew Garrett <mj...@srcf.ucam.org> wrote: > On Sun, Apr 19, 2015 at 11:37:31PM +0200, Kay Sievers wrote: >> I'm not convinced that any such broad matches for power management >> belong into udev at all. Udev can carry specific device matches, or >> carry data that cannot be determined from the device itself, like the >> mouse resolution and such, but like in these rules, reading the vendor >> from the kernel and unconditionally flipping a bit back into the >> kernel does not look like a task for udev or userspace in general. > > Is there any possibility that you can be convinced?
I'd much prefer if this was hwdb based. This way, we have a sane database that just sets something like POWER_CONTROL=foobar, which we can then apply via udev. Given that the power-control issues seem to be totally random, hwdb really sounds like the nicer solution. Any reason why hwdb would not work? Thanks David _______________________________________________ systemd-devel mailing list systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
