On 05/15/2015 07:54 AM, jsyna...@redhat.com wrote:
From: Jan Synacek <jsyna...@redhat.com> --- changes in v2: * simplified creation of new arguments (replaced unnecessary dynamic allocation with a VLA) * renamed add_file_change to unit_file_add_changes * addressed wording issues in documentation
Hmm is the usecase for this to spare administrator having to type twice the systemctl command on the console as in systemctl start $foo && systemctl enable $foo becomes "systemctl start --now $foo"
If that's the case would it not be better to simply support "systemctl start enable $foo" rather then introducing yet another switch for administrators to remember?
On top of that is not "now" a bit confusing word to be using for this behaviour ?
JBG _______________________________________________ systemd-devel mailing list systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel