On Fri, 15.05.15 11:38, Ivan Shapovalov (intelfx...@gmail.com) wrote: > > Hmm, if , I think this should be fixable though. Already, > > allocating a unit, loading a unit and starting a unit are three > > separate steps. It shouldn't be too hard to fix PID 1 to allow > > allocating all transient units to create in a group first, then in > > a second step load all of them, and finally start one of > > them. With such an order in place it should be easily possible to > > do what you want to do, no? > > Yeah, makes sense. I'll try to do that in meantime. > > BTW, regarding creating aux units from systemd-run(1). I guess it can > be done in two ways: > > - "--aux-unit" parameter which adds another aux unit and makes all > following parameters (until another --aux-unit) set parameters of this > new aux unit (i. e. stateful command line); > > - "--aux-units-from-file" parameter or something like that which reads > the given file and parses each line of it as a separate command line, > creating an aux unit from it. > > The former would look like this: > > $ systemd-run --name foo.service -p Wants=aux-1.service /bin/foo \ > --aux-unit --name aux-1.service -p BindsTo=foo.service /bin/aux-1 > > The latter (in bash syntax) would look like this: > > $ systemd-run --name foo.service -p Wants=aux-1.service /bin/foo \ > --aux-units-from-file /dev/stdin <<-EOF > --name aux-1.service -p BindsTo=foo.service /bin/aux-1 > EOF > > Would any of this be OK?
Hmm, what about this: use "--" as separator for multiple unit definitions? $ systemd-run --name=foo.service /bin/foo -- --name=bar.service -p Nice=80 /bin/bar -- -p Nice=20 --name=bazz.service /usr/bin/bazz Alternatively, we could use ";" as separator, similar to /usr/bin/find does it... But I think "--" is nicer... Lennart -- Lennart Poettering, Red Hat _______________________________________________ systemd-devel mailing list systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
