On Tue, 26.05.15 19:13, Reindl Harald (h.rei...@thelounge.net) wrote:

> Am 26.05.2015 um 18:22 schrieb Lennart Poettering:
> >On Tue, 26.05.15 17:57, Reindl Harald (h.rei...@thelounge.net) wrote:
> >>
> >>Am 26.05.2015 um 17:29 schrieb Lennart Poettering:
> >>>On Tue, 26.05.15 16:39, Reindl Harald (h.rei...@thelounge.net) wrote:
> >>>>which shows that a important project like systemd playing on the same 
> >>>>level
> >>>>as the linux kernel *just needs* point releases, there is a reason that 
> >>>>the
> >>>>kernel has point-releases and not only for the latest and greatest 
> >>>>version,
> >>>>systemd as well as the kernel are not a random webbrowser
> >>>
> >>>There's a stable git tree maintained by Zbigniew, Lukas and friends,
> >>>that carries backports for the stable releases. Most vendors should
> >>>consider following that repo I figure.
> >>>
> >>>I try to help the backporting business by tagging the commits I
> >>>personally consider backport-worthy with "git notes" and the
> >>>"Backport:" field
> >>
> >>it just works poor
> >>
> >>* https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1185278
> >>   never got fixed in F20 but is fixed in Fedora 21
> >
> >Well, it's not really a bug. We require util-linux to be around. If
> >you make it unavailable then you get to to keep the pieces. It's that
> >simple
> sftp-chroot worked fine until Fedora 20 and started to work again with
> Fedora 21 so please don't pretend anything else than systemd is (or was)
> responsible to fail proper shutdown and termination of the recently by
> systemd invented user-session processes

Well, we still require /usr/bin/kill from util-linux to be around. We
did not fix your "bug"... Maybe this doesn't trip up anymore, but we
didn't specifically "fix" anything...


Lennart Poettering, Red Hat
systemd-devel mailing list

Reply via email to