On Wed, 27.05.15 15:30, Martin Pitt (martin.p...@ubuntu.com) wrote: > Lennart Poettering [2015-05-27 15:18 +0200]: > > Maybe introducing a new tool for this that covers all options is the > > better idea. Let's call it /usr/lib/systemd/systemd-sysv-install or > > so, taking the --root= switch as before, plus "enable", "disable", > > "is-enabled" plus one or more LSB init script names is the better > > option... > > To reiterate, I'm really worried about "multiple names". Not only does > that needlessly complicate the implementation of the wrapper, it also > seems like unnecessarily introducing ambiguity. What should > > is-enabled foo bar baz > > mean? "any", "all", "first", "error"? > > Where do we need this? systemctl calls stuff one by one in a loop > anyway?
OK, sounds Ok to not do this then. Lennart -- Lennart Poettering, Red Hat _______________________________________________ systemd-devel mailing list systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
