Hi David,
+static int method_find_proxy(sd_bus *bus, sd_bus_message *message,
void *userdata, sd_bus_error *error) {
+ _cleanup_free_ char *p = strdup("DIRECT");
+ Manager *m = userdata;
+ int r;
+
+ assert(bus);
+ assert(message);
+ assert(m);
+
+ r = proxy_execute(m->default_proxies, message);
+ if (r < 0)
+ sd_bus_reply_method_return(message, "s", p);
+
+ return 1;
+}
That seems to be making no attempt to use the *correct* proxy
configuration according to the request.
In the case of things like split-tunnel VPNs, we want to handle it
basically the same way that we handle DNS.
Requests within the VPN's DNS domains, and the IP ranges which are
routed to the VPN, need to be resolved according to the VPN's proxy
configuration. And everything else needs to be resolved according to
the local proxy configuration.
NetworkManager already sets up dnsmasq to do precisely this for DNS.
This is all known. This thread was meant to be just an RFC so only the very
basics of the beginning of a proposal.
Tomasz
_______________________________________________
systemd-devel mailing list
systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
