On Tue, Jul 21, 2015 at 02:20:39PM +0100, Dimitri John Ledkov wrote: > And then people can do e.g.: > systemctl enable nifty@4.service nifty@6.service > systemctl start nifty@*.service > systemctl stop nifty@*.service
As I mentioned in my original mail, this is explictly not wanted, as most users will have to start and stop both instances together. We cannot make our lives simpler at the cost of our users. And yes, this is true for both systemd upstream and software packagers, a transitive relationship. Greetings Marc -- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- Marc Haber | "I don't trust Computers. They | Mailadresse im Header Leimen, Germany | lose things." Winona Ryder | Fon: *49 6224 1600402 Nordisch by Nature | How to make an American Quilt | Fax: *49 6224 1600421 _______________________________________________ systemd-devel mailing list systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
