Ahm, I understand, Although it's actually a pitty. I believe it could be
useful in some cases notably remote login, not quite sure though.
W dniu 22.08.2015 o 16:58, Mantas Mikulėnas pisze:
Well, you just wouldn't have more than one graphical session. That's
part of the general plan afaik.
Note that this is already half-broken, because some of those programs
actually *expect* to be unique *per user* – e.g. dconf-daemon for
writing to the dconf db – and having two copies of it in two sessions
might be bad…
On Sat, Aug 22, 2015, 13:36 Michał Zegan <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
Hello.
I believe, although may be wrong, that session buses were used to
enforce single instances of programs, like a program registered a name
on dbus and another instance of the same program could not run.
How would it affect user buses in case of multiple graphical user
sessions?
_______________________________________________
systemd-devel mailing list
[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
_______________________________________________
systemd-devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
