Am 16.09.2015 um 17:52 schrieb Kok, Auke-jan H:
On Wed, Sep 16, 2015 at 8:38 AM, Reindl Harald <h.rei...@thelounge.net> wrote:Am 16.09.2015 um 17:13 schrieb Ahmed S. Darwish:Not to mention that the same rolling-release model was adopted by the kernel long time ago for similar reasons and much more ;-)that is *not* true and won't become true by repeat it https://www.kernel.org/ mainline: 4.2 2015-08-30 stable: 4.1.7 2015-09-13 longterm: 3.18.21 2015-08-31 only systemd upstream has from the core component a "that is the new version with no major/minor" attitude and the kernel is the very last project to compare given "longterm: 2.6.32.67 2015-06-03"nonsense. Only one of those three mentioned is actually "the linux kernel". The other two are independently running forks that "the linux kernel" maintainer does not maintain. So, he's actually entirely correct to paraphrase that the linux kernel community is using a rolling release model. The fact that individuals make "respins" that follow a non-rolling release model does not diminish the truth of that in any way possible
nonsense 4.1.x will get a lot more updates while 4.2.x get them too systemd never ever had any minor release
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ systemd-devel mailing list systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
