If you only want one instance running, why not just create one service and
reconfigure/restart it?

On Mon, Oct 5, 2015, 09:04 Johannes Ernst <johannes.er...@gmail.com> wrote:

> I have a foo@.service. When started as
>         systemctl start foo@abc
> I’d like all other currently active foo@… services to stop, and vice
> versa. All of the foo@.services are supposed to be mutually exclusive
> with each other.
>
> In foo@.service, I attempted:
>         Conflicts: foo@.service
> but that does not seem to do the trick (Starting foo@abc produces
> "Dependency Conflicts=foo@abc.service dropped”)
>
> I’d like to avoid having to enumerate foo@abc, foo@def etc. in the
> Conflicts section.
>
> Ideas?
>
> Thanks,
>
>
>
> Johannes.
>
> _______________________________________________
> systemd-devel mailing list
> systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
> http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
>
_______________________________________________
systemd-devel mailing list
systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel

Reply via email to