On Wed, 04.11.15 15:54, Andrei Borzenkov (arvidj...@gmail.com) wrote: > 04.11.2015 00:04, Andrew Jones пишет: > >afaict, this will fix a regression caused by commit 75f86906c5. > >Where we used to report "kvm" before that patch, without this patch, > >we would only report "qemu". > > Are you sure it is regression? QEMU is a program (platform) while KVM is > technology. Modern VirtualBox can use KVM as PV interface but it still > remains VirtualBox. QEMU may use KVM as PV interface but it still remains > QEMU. > > Where does it matter? Is anything broken because of this change?
I am pretty sure that vbox should be reported as vbox even if it uses kvm as backend. qemu-kvm should be reported as kvm, and any other qemu as qemu. Yeah, it's not fully symmetric, but I am pretty sure that's what most people would expect. Lennart -- Lennart Poettering, Red Hat _______________________________________________ systemd-devel mailing list systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
