On Mon, Nov 9, 2015 at 12:30 AM, Greg KH <gre...@linuxfoundation.org> wrote: > On Sun, Nov 08, 2015 at 10:39:43PM +0100, Richard Weinberger wrote: >> On Sun, Nov 8, 2015 at 10:35 PM, Greg KH <gre...@linuxfoundation.org> wrote: >> > On Sun, Nov 08, 2015 at 10:06:31PM +0100, Richard Weinberger wrote: >> >> Hi all, >> >> >> >> after reading on the removal of kdbus from Rawhide I've searched >> >> the mailinglist archives for more details but didn't find anything. >> >> So, what are your plans? >> >> >> >>  >> >> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/kernel/2015-October/006011.html >> > >> > As that link said, based on the result of the code being in Rawhide, it >> > is now being reworked / redesigned. The result will be posted for >> > review "when it's ready". >> >> If you rework/redesign something you have to know what you want to change. >> That's why I was asking for the plan... > > Since when do people post "plans" or "design documents" on lkml without > real code? Again, code will be posted when it's ready, like any other > kernel submission.
Nobody asked for a design document. And yes, people often say what they do or want to do. Anyway, heise.de has details from the systemd.conf: http://www.heise.de/open/meldung/Linux-Kdbus-soll-universeller-werden-Videos-von-Systemd-Konferenz-2910910.html According to them the plan is making kdbus more universal and less dbus specific. Which sounds great. -- Thanks, //richard _______________________________________________ systemd-devel mailing list firstname.lastname@example.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel