On 02/18/2016 12:19 PM, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson wrote: > On 02/18/2016 10:22 AM, Daniel Mack wrote: >> I disagree. All sorts of testing is good for us, and if a PR is breaking >> downstream Ubuntu, and we recognize that before merging, that's really >> great. > > I'm all for more testing the better but due to downstream fragmentation
Fragmentation? Martin does not apply any patches downstream for his tests, so I don't see where this fear is coming from? > all these have the same fundamental problem as are with multiple > downstream issue trackers. But it's different for CI really. > In this case you start slowing down integration if PR start failing in "if". Let's see how things go, and assess the situation if we really face too many false positives. As I said - we're running all our CI on Ubuntu so far, and unrelated build breakages have rarely been a real issue. And again - if things break, we should at least learn about the fact. Thanks, Daniel _______________________________________________ systemd-devel mailing list systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel