On Mon, 22.02.16 10:45, Kok, Auke-jan H (auke-jan.h....@intel.com) wrote: > On Wed, Feb 17, 2016 at 4:49 PM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek > <zbys...@in.waw.pl> wrote: > > On Wed, Feb 17, 2016 at 09:17:51AM -0800, Kok, Auke-jan H wrote: > >> Splitting it out increases that potential and will allow > >> systemd-bootchart to evolve out of cycle again, and look a bit over > >> the fence. I've reviewed most of the changes to it, and noticed a bit > >> of a drop of risky commits, and those are the ones that are going to > >> be needed for this project to make it a useful tool in the future. > >> > >> So, I think this is a great move, one that certainly will motivate me > >> to engage more deeply again :) > > Hi Auke, > > > > what kind of big changes would you have in mind? > > Just the fact of being in one repo with systemd should not have > > much effect on changes to bootchart which is mostly standalone... > > I have been asked on several occasions to make bootchart more > palatable for other OS's, including ChromeOS and even Android. This > has previously been shelved entirely, and I don't know if it's > currently even feasible, but at least logistically it should be a lot > easier to attempt. > > The rest of the things I was looking at were items that being in-tree > did not affect, like new ways of grouping the process bars, better IO > visualization, etc.
Auke, could you have a look at https://github.com/systemd/systemd/pull/2664 and give your blessing? Lennart -- Lennart Poettering, Red Hat _______________________________________________ systemd-devel mailing list systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel