On Mon, 23.05.16 12:12, Reindl Harald (h.rei...@thelounge.net) wrote: > Am 23.05.2016 um 11:59 schrieb Lennart Poettering: > >On Mon, 23.05.16 11:34, Florian Weimer (fwei...@redhat.com) wrote: > >>I think the trigger is just implemented incorrectly. It should keep track > >>of UUIDs in files (such as /usr/.change-uuid), rather than looking at > >>mtimes. Then you can just write a new UUID once you update parts of the > >>file system externally and completely avoid running such triggers when all > >>subtrees are locally maintained. > > > >I am not sure I grok why uuids would be a better option than mtimes here... > > because it's explicit while mtime can change out of context
I'd claim that any bumping of "mtime" really is very much *in* context... Lennart -- Lennart Poettering, Red Hat _______________________________________________ systemd-devel mailing list systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
