17.09.2016 14:23, Dark Penguin пишет: >>> Now that systemd manages the shutdown procedure, I don't know if it's >>> possible to achieve the same behaviour (and thus make NUT work with >>> systemd). >> >> As already mentioned, it is ouside of scope of OS actually. How you did >> it before systemd? > > It was actually a feature of NUT - and a default and recommended feature > at some moment. > See this, from their FAQ:
Advertising
So you do not even bother to describe how it worked before so others may suggest how it can be (re-)implemented using systemd? Oh, well ... > http://networkupstools.org/docs/FAQ.html#_i_8217_m_facing_a_power_race > And this - https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=835634 > (there is a link to an old discussion about implementing this feature). > Now it doesn't work anymore, and I'm trying to find a new solution... > > ... > > >> systemd supports switching back to initramfs instead of directly halting >> system. This allows you to implement your logic there after everything >> is completely shut down and unmounted (you probably need to unmount old >> root manually though). You can even monitor UPS from initramfs and only >> reboot when it reports power is back to make it safe. > > This may be the best idea without touching the kernel. But it still > can't go through the "proper" halt procedure with syncing and unloading > the drives, correct?.. > > I have no idea what "unloading the drives" means. _______________________________________________ systemd-devel mailing list systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
