On Wed, 12.04.17 21:09, Michael Biebl (mbi...@gmail.com) wrote: > 2017-04-12 20:24 GMT+02:00 Tomasz Torcz <to...@pipebreaker.pl>: > > On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 11:01:04AM -0700, Auke Kok wrote: > >> The right (or, better) solution IMHO would be for mysqld to signal to > >> systemd that it's running OK before recovery starts, using type=notify. > >> This way recovery can take as long as needed, and if it fails, it could > >> signal this failure as normal back to systemd. Then systemd would retry > >> the recovery a few times this way and finally give up. > > > > It wouldn't be good solution. READY=1 means clients can connect and > > talk to the database. Signalling readiness prematurely would break > > functionality.. > > Maybe we'd need a new state paramenter, like STARTING=1 which could be > sent by the daemon to systemd in regular intervals and would signal > systemd that the startup of the daemon is in process and the daemon is > not actually hung.
There was an RFE somewhere for supporting watchdog messages (i.e. WATCHDOG=1) during startup too, not just during runtime. I'd be fine with adding that. Lennart -- Lennart Poettering, Red Hat _______________________________________________ systemd-devel mailing list systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
