On Tue, 2017-05-30 at 18:07 +0000, Moravec, Stanislav (ERT) wrote: > OK. Understood, thanks much! > We'll try to follow up on using some parent process (xinetd or something like > that).
BTW your problem description wasn't very clear. Is your specific problem case about socket activation of normal services (the issue being that if the service has not been started before shutdown it won't be, but things work if something did start it earlier) or about Accept=true sockets that start a new service instance from template for each connection? I'd guess that the latter might be somewhat easier to support architecturally, though I'm not familiar enough with that to say for sure. _______________________________________________ systemd-devel mailing list systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
