On Mi, 01.11.17 11:40, Michael Biebl (mbi...@gmail.com) wrote: > 2017-11-01 10:56 GMT+01:00 Lennart Poettering <lenn...@poettering.net>: > > > > Hmm, rpc_pipefs is a virtual API fs, right? If so, it really shouldn't > > be mounted below /var in the first place. Any chance you can work with > > the NFS folks to maybe move it below /run (or /sys or so) where API > > file systems really belong? Otherwise everybody who wants to run /var > > on FNS will run into the same problems sooner or later. > > Fwiw, in Debian rpc_pipefs is mounted under /run: > > $ systemctl cat run-rpc_pipefs.mount > # /lib/systemd/system/run-rpc_pipefs.mount > [Unit] > Description=RPC Pipe File System > DefaultDependencies=no > Conflicts=umount.target > > [Mount] > What=sunrpc > Where=/run/rpc_pipefs > Type=rpc_pipefs
I wished people would stop placing stuff directly below /run, and instead stick to per-subsystem subdirs, i.e /run/nfs/rpc_pipefs would be the better place I think. So, Fedora/RHEL/upstream go the subsystem directory part right, and Debian got the /run thing right. I wished people could agree on /run/nfs as a common solution now ;-) Lennart -- Lennart Poettering, Red Hat _______________________________________________ systemd-devel mailing list systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
