https://anonscm.debian.org/git/pkg-systemd/systemd.git/commit/debian/extra/pam.d/systemd-user?id=b3238e9604fa61c7ec45a2d0acc1f8b40728cd87
This might be relevant to you. See how the pam config contains pam_limits 2017-11-20 18:49 GMT+01:00 Lennart Poettering <[email protected]>: > On Mo, 20.11.17 09:47, Jeff Solomon ([email protected]) wrote: > >> I guess the answer is "no." :) >> >> This is Ubuntu 16.04. On CentOS7.3, pam_limits is part of systemd-user >> through system-auth >> >> Here is /etc/pam.d/systemd-user from my Ubuntu system: >> >> # This file is part of systemd. >> # >> # Used by systemd --user instances. >> >> @include common-account >> >> session required pam_selinux.so close >> session required pam_selinux.so nottys open >> @include common-session-noninteractive >> session optional pam_systemd.so > > Have you checked the snippets listed in the @include lines? Maybe they > pull it in? > >> So on RHEL systems, it doesn't matter that is works because user instances >> are officially not included and it just doesn't work on Ubuntu because >> pam_limits is not used by systemd-user. >> >> I find it odd that two major distros differ in this behavior. > > PAM is a mess. Setups and syntax vary wildly between distros. It's sad. > > Lennart > > -- > Lennart Poettering, Red Hat > _______________________________________________ > systemd-devel mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel -- Why is it that all of the instruments seeking intelligent life in the universe are pointed away from Earth? _______________________________________________ systemd-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
