On Do, 11.01.18 17:24, Andrei Borzenkov (arvidj...@gmail.com) wrote: > Ordering dependencies are between jobs. To have any effect here > systemd must have both start jobs queued concurrently. What is > unexpected is that multiple services are apparently submitted as > individual independent jobs, not as single "transaction". I am not > sure even if there is method to start multiple units concurrently. > > > Is this behavior documented somewhere? > > The systemctl behavior? Not to my best knowledge, at least explicitly.
Yeah, we should document this behaviour. Anyone cares to file a bug? or even prep a PR? I figure the original plan was to keep our options open by not documenting the precise effect, in order that we can change behaviour here and make it a single transaction, but since we still didn't do that I figure we should document behaviour here, and when we add this later do so in an opt-in way via some switch, since such a change of behaviour would be pretty much a compat breakage at this point. Lennart -- Lennart Poettering, Red Hat _______________________________________________ systemd-devel mailing list systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
