Hi folks, "systemctl is-active" command gives "inactive" no matter the unit exists and indeed inactive or it just not exist. This behavior is semantically true since a unit can never be active if it does not exist. But "systemctl is-enabled" command will give a clear result "Failed to get unit file state for no-exist.service: No such file or directory" to indicate user the existence of the given unit. I am wondering if "systemctl is-active" should behave the same.
systemctl --version systemd 235 systemctl is-active non-exist.service inactive systemctl is-enabled non-exist.service Failed to get unit file state for non-exist.service: No such file or directory Best regards, Kevin Hsu
_______________________________________________ systemd-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
