On Mon, May 13, 2019 at 4:49 PM Mike Gilbert <flop...@gentoo.org> wrote: > > Just a guess: I wonder if that 'auls' value is left over from the > previous CPUID result. If that's the case, a simple solution might be > to zero-out ebx, ecx, and edx in __cpuid().
Mike, I tried your suggestion and added this patch to gcc 7.3.0: --- cpuid.h.orig 2019-05-18 13:20:49.000000000 -0400 +++ cpuid.h 2019-05-14 05:52:11.000000000 -0400 @@ -251,8 +251,6 @@ if (__maxlevel == 0 || __maxlevel < __leaf) return 0; + *__ebx = *__ecx = *__edx = 0; + __cpuid (__leaf, *__eax, *__ebx, *__ecx, *__edx); return 1; } That didn't work, but perhaps I am putting it in the wrong function? Any suggestions? - Matthew _______________________________________________ systemd-devel mailing list firstname.lastname@example.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel