On Tue, Jul 09, 2019 at 10:23:47AM +0200, Ulrich Windl wrote: > >>> Zbigniew Jedrzejewski-Szmek <[email protected]> schrieb am 09.07.2019 um > 10:05 > in Nachricht <[email protected]>: > > On Tue, Jul 09, 2019 at 08:49:32AM +0200, Ulrich Windl wrote: > >> Hi! > >> > >> It seems "‑‑state=failed" is being ignored silently for "systemctl status" > (in > > version 228). Is this by design? > > > > Nope. In 242‑1092+ it seems to work fine. > > In v228 is is effective for "list-units", but not for "status"...
Oh, right. I checked "list-units", but not "status". "systemctl status 'systemd*' --state=running" and "systemctl status 'systemd*' --state=failed" both seem to do the right thing here. Zbyszek _______________________________________________ systemd-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
