On Mi, 18.03.20 12:14, Daan De Meyer (daan.j.deme...@gmail.com) wrote: > I completely agree that for errors returned by the service, a D-Bus error > is a lot better. However, from what I understand of sd-bus, any errors > returned by the service are encoded in the reply returned by sd_bus_call > and you use sd_bus_message_is_method_error and sd_bus_message_get_error on > the reply to get the actual service error. Where does that leave the > sd_bus_error argument of sd_bus_call?
We *either* return an error and fill in sd_bus_error (on error) *or* we return a reply msg (on success). i.e. you won't get an sd_bus_message object from sd_bus_call() at all on error, hence nothing you could look into with sd_bus_message_get_error(). Lennart -- Lennart Poettering, Berlin _______________________________________________ systemd-devel mailing list systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
