On Wed, 2021-05-19 at 02:19 +0200, Guillem Jover wrote: > So this is where I guess I'm missing something. To be able to make > sense of the coredumps there are two things that might end up being > relevant, backtraces and source code. systemd-coredump might already
I understood Luca's point to be about more basic metadata. Not in the context of a human analyzing coredumps, but having basic information about *what* crashed in log files. So when the system gets a coredump, the goal is to have more information in the logs than just "some process crashed in the container" and name of the binary. Instead the logs would contain information about what package/version the binary is from (or at least claims to be from). And writing log files should not involve loading any extra data from the network. _______________________________________________ systemd-devel mailing list systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
