Also to prove that it’s not a switch issue I have launched this configuration and everything works. VMs get IP in the VLAN 166.
However this configuration is not very dynamic because I cannot control Libvirt vnet names so I need to match all the vnet interfaces. salmazz@nux-11-i7 /e/s/network> cat br0.netdev [NetDev] Name=br0 Kind=bridge [Bridge] VLANFiltering=yes salmazz@nux-11-i7 /e/s/network> cat br0.network [Match] Name=br0 [Network] DHCP=yes salmazz@nux-11-i7 /e/s/network> cat enp89s0.network # This file is managed by Salt via salt://systemd/networkd/templates/profile.jinja [Match] Name=enp89s0 [Network] Bridge=br0 [BridgeVLAN] VLAN=166 salmazz@nux-11-i7 /e/s/network> cat vnet.network [Match] Name=vnet* [Network] Bridge=br0 [BridgeVLAN] VLAN=166 PVID=166 EgressUntagged=166 On 19. 11. 2022 10:26 +0100, Salvatore Mazzarino <apocalips...@gmail.com>, wrote: > bridge vlan show > > port vlan-id > enp89s0 1 PVID Egress Untagged > br0 1 PVID Egress Untagged > br166 1 PVID Egress Untagged > eth.166 1 Egress Untagged > 166 PVID Egress Untagged > virbr0 1 PVID Egress Untagged > > Just to understand. I attach VMs to the br166. In this case also enp89s0 > should allow VLAN 166? > On 19. 11. 2022 10:17 +0100, Salvatore Mazzarino <apocalips...@gmail.com>, > wrote: > > I do not think it's a switch issue. The systemd configuration is surely > > wrong but I'm not sure where. > >
