Is it wise to use only `homectl` to manage human users *without* reciprocal entries in /etc/passwd, /etc/group, or /etc/shadow?
$ systemd-analyze security wireplumber --user | NAME | Description | Exposure | | ----------------------| -------------- | ----------- | | ❌ User=/DynamicUser= | Service runs.. | 0.4 | → Overall exposure level for wireplumber.service... $ systemctl edit wireplumber.service --user ### Editing /home/me/.config/systemd/user/wireplumber.service.d/override.conf ### Anything between here and the comment below will become the contents of the... [Service] User=%u Group=%g ### Edits below this comment will be discarded ... $ systemctl daemon-reload --user $ systemctl restart wireplumber.service --user $ journalctl -r --unit=wireplumber --user systemd[851]: Failed to start Multimedia Service Session Manager. systemd[851]: wireplumber.service: Failed with result 'exit-code'. systemd[851]: wireplumber.service: Start request repeated too quickly. systemd[851]: wireplumber.service: Scheduled restart job, restart counter is at 5. systemd[851]: wireplumber.service: Failed with result 'exit-code'. systemd[851]: wireplumber.service: Main process exited, code=exited, status=216/GROUP (eplumber)[11087]: wireplumber.service: Failed at step GROUP spawning /usr/bin/wireplumber: Operation not permitted *(eplumber)[11087]: wireplumber.service: Failed to determine supplementary groups: Operation not permitted* systemd[851]: Started Multimedia Service Session Manager. homectl should already know of this user's supplementary groups, unless homectl is searching for them in `/etc/groups` instead? --D
