On Wed, Jun 26, 2024 at 05:05:38PM GMT, Lennart Poettering 
<lenn...@poettering.net> wrote:
> This is not as easy to support,

I thought this would be as "simple" as adding a slice property into user
record [1] nowadays.

> because currently the hierarchy carries meaning, i.e. to determine if
> something belongs to user scope, we check if it's below the user.slice
> cgroup and so on.

What's an example of user/non-user distinction need?

> We could fix this, by stuffing more info in the session scope name,
> and this has been on the todo list for a longer time, but so far noone
> sat down and implemented this.

Didn't you mean cgroup xattrs?

Thanks,
Michal

[1] https://systemd.io/USER_RECORD/

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to