Sorry Dan, your response is nonsense. Was Mary Slaney the only woman on
birth control pills? No. Who else has a false positive, then? No one.
Has Mary Slaney ever shown that her E/P ratio is elevated because of
birth control pills? No. Has she ever offered to be tested? The answer
is no. Why? You know.

Why not? The answer certainly is not money. Much of it was wasted on
nuisance lawsuits. It would seem that if athletes were being wronged by
the big, bad IAAF then the cause would be there for an advocate of
fairness. The reason is simple, when Slaney was busted, she chose to
drag a lot of well-meaning people into this last, most public tantrum of
hers.

malmo

-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dan Kaplan
Sent: Tuesday, August 12, 2003 3:13 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: t-and-f: Slaney for Hall of Fame?


--- Kurt Bray <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It would seem to me that the burden of proof here is on Slaney.  The 
> test has already been "proven" and is currently in place and accepted 
> as a valid measure of doping.  If Slaney (or anyone else) cares to 
> assert that the test is flawed or that she is an exception, it's going

> to be up to her to prove it.  It's not up to the doping agencies to 
> refute her assertion.

Sorry Kurt, but that's nonsense.  If the test is to determine the
livelihood of all athletes, then it should be well enough tested to
ensure it is valid across the full range of athletes.  That includes
testing it on women taking birth control pills.  If that was done, then
there's no issue.  Just release the findings and be done with it.  If it
hasn't been done, then the test is standing on very shaky ground and
deserves to be fired away at.

> As things now stand Mary is a convicted doper.
> I don't favor putting Ben Johnson in any sort of Canadian Track Hall
of 
> Fame, neither do I favor putting Slaney in the US Hall of Fame.

Not the best of examples, seeing as how Ben is a more or less admitted
doper and Mary isn't.  If the test which found her guilty can't be
supported (emphasis on "if"), then the whole thing is hogwash.

Dan

=====
http://AbleDesign.com - Web Design & Custom Programming
http://Run-Down.com - 10,000 Running Links, Fantasy T&F
------------------------------------------------------------
  @    o      Dan Kaplan - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 <|\/ <^-  ( [EMAIL PROTECTED] or [EMAIL PROTECTED] )
_/ \ \/\      (503)370-9969 phone/fax
   /   /

__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! SiteBuilder - Free, easy-to-use web site design software
http://sitebuilder.yahoo.com


Reply via email to