This article from NYTimes.com 
has been sent to you by [EMAIL PROTECTED]

/-------------------- advertisement -----------------------\

FOR YOUR CONSIDERATION: IN AMERICA - IN THEATRES NOVEMBER 26

Fox Searchlight Pictures proudly presents IN AMERICA
directed by Academy Award(R) Nominee Jim Sheridan (My Left
Foot and In The Name of the Father). IN AMERICA stars Samantha
Morton, Paddy Considine and Djimon Hounsou. For more info:
http://www.foxsearchlight.com/inamerica

\----------------------------------------------------------/

Decoding a Steroid: Hunches, Sweat, Vindication

November 2, 2003
 By JERE LONGMAN and JOE DRAPE 



 

Last June 13, a test tube of clear liquid arrived by
overnight mail at the Olympic drug-testing laboratory at
the University of California, Los Angeles. The liquid
included residue from a syringe that a tipster said
contained an undetectable anabolic steroid. 

In 21 years as director of the laboratory, Dr. Donald H.
Catlin had never encountered a smoking gun like this. He
had believed for several years that some athletes were
cheating with impunity by using designer steroids, and now
he had a chance to prove it. 

Over the next three months, using high-tech screening
devices and low-tech tools like pencil and paper, Dr.
Catlin and a team of eight chemists cracked the chemical
code of the steroid, tetrahydrogestrinone, or THG,
synthesized it and developed a test to catch those who used
it. 

The result has been a billowing scandal. Urine samples from
five track athletes, including Regina Jacobs, the perennial
top American women's miler, and Dwain Chambers, Britain's
top sprinter, who trains in California, have shown THG in
preliminary tests, according to officials familiar with the
results. The athletes did not knowingly take a prohibited
substance, their lawyers have said. 

The federal authorities are investigating a nutritional
supplement company, the Bay Area Laboratory Cooperative, or
Balco, which one anti-doping official called the likely
source of the steroid. Subpoenas to appear before a grand
jury have been issued to baseball stars like Barry Bonds
and Jason Giambi, and reportedly to dozens of other
athletes including various professional football players,
the boxer Shane Mosley and the sprinter Marion Jones. 

A lawyer for one of the athletes said the authorities were
investigating the sale and distribution of THG, along with
possible tax evasion by Balco. Victor Conte, Balco's
president, has denied being the source of the THG. 

Apparently for the first time in a game of pharmacological
cat and mouse that has spanned four decades, an unknown
performance-enhancing drug has been identified, a test for
it has been developed and urine samples have been
re-examined before any athletes who might have used the
drug were aware that the authorities knew the steroid
existed. 

It has left the scientists who detected THG with a
bittersweet sense of enormous accomplishment and dread. 

"It's really nice to be able to solve an important, complex
problem," Dr. Catlin, 65, a professor of molecular and
medical pharmacology, said in a telephone interview. 

On the other hand, the existence of the steroid would
undoubtedly not be known if a track coach who has not been
identified had not stepped forward. He gave the syringe to
anti-doping officials in Colorado, who sent it to Dr.
Catlin. 

There must be other undetected steroids out there, Dr.
Catlin believes, made by clandestine labs without regard to
approved safety standards or federal laws. "I do shiver a
lot," Dr. Catlin said in contemplating a prospect he calls
horrifying. 

Dr. Caroline Hatton, a chemist at the U.C.L.A. lab, agreed.
"It's pretty chilling," she said. "It's like our worst
nightmare was just proved. This might just be the tip of
the iceberg. We hope to learn more in a few days, weeks,
months. We're a little afraid of what we don't know and may
never learn." 

A Longstanding Problem 

Dr. Hatton and Dr. Catlin work in a low-slung building
abutting an auto body shop two miles from the main U.C.L.A.
campus. There is no sign on the door to identify it as the
Olympic Analytical Laboratory. If the outside is
nondescript, though, the inside contains one of the world's
foremost laboratories for the research and testing of
performance-enhancing drugs. 

Each year, 25,000 tests are conducted here for clients like
the United States Olympic Committee, the National
Collegiate Athletic Association and the National Football
League. The laboratory opened in 1982 and served as the
official drug-testing center for the 1984 Summer Olympics
in Los Angeles; later it provided screening for the Games
in Atlanta and Salt Lake City. The U.C.L.A. laboratory is
one of 30 worldwide accredited by the International Olympic
Committee, and the only one in the United States. 

"Frankly, I didn't know much about the problem when I first
started," Dr. Catlin said. He had grown interested in the
drug issue while helping to treat heroin addicts as a young
doctor in Washington but had heard little of the abuse of
performance-enhancing drugs in sport. 

"I didn't believe it," Dr. Catlin said. "Why would a
sportsman take drugs?" 

As the 1984 Games approached, Dr. Catlin read all the
literature he could find and learned about steroids by
visiting with bodybuilders on Venice Beach in Los Angeles. 

"I learned enough to know they worked," he said. 

His
suspicions about designer steroids grew last year when Dr.
Catlin tested a cyclist's urine and found norbolethone, a
steroid that had been developed by a drug company in the
1960's but never marketed. If people were synthesizing
steroids from arcane literature published 40 years earlier,
Dr. Catlin reasoned, they might also be designing
undetectable drugs. He was determined to catch them. 

"He is like a tractor, always grinding forward in low
gear," Ed Williams, a lawyer representing Ms. Jacobs, said
of Dr. Catlin. 

In mid-June, upon receiving a test-tube sample of the
still-unknown drug, contained in the solvent methanol, Dr.
Catlin performed a standard test known as gas
chromatography-mass spectrometry. A droplet of purified
sample was injected into a sophisticated oven, where it was
vaporized in temperatures approaching 400 degrees and was
swept by helium gas along a coiled column 50 feet long.
Next, the substance was bombarded with electrons and
fragmented, creating a molecular fingerprint. 

The drug had been forwarded to the U.C.L.A. laboratory by
the United States Anti-Doping Agency, a nonprofit
organization that receives federal funding and enforces
drug testing in Olympic-related sports. Armed with a grant
of about $100,000 from the anti-doping organization, Dr.
Catlin and his team went to work trying to identify the
substance. 

Within two or three days, the scientists knew the drug
belonged to the steroid family. Steroids are synthetic
versions of the male hormone testosterone and are illicitly
used to build muscle and recover quickly from injury and
strenuous workouts. 

Dr. Catlin, though, still had no idea exactly what anabolic
steroid he had on his hands. He checked a routine computer
program that identifies known steroids and came up empty.
He and his laboratory associates began referring to the
substance as Compound X. 

Typically, when a steroid is sent through the long column
of the gas chromatograph, its identity can be viewed on a
computer screen as a sharp peak. The peak corresponds with
the steroid's retention time in the column. In this case,
Dr. Catlin saw not one peak but a forest of 25 or 30 peaks,
which indicated Compound X's impurity, complexity and
insidious elusiveness. Essentially, the substance
disintegrated during drug screening and thus was not
detectable. 

"There are two hypotheses," Dr. Catlin said. "One is that
it was deliberately designed and tested, that people knew
it was not going to be detectable. We have some reason to
believe that way. The other is that they made it and it
came out undetectable, just a happy occurrence." 

Finding the Solution 

Now the real chemical sleuthing
began. 

To identify Compound X, Dr. Catlin had to make it more
stable, so that it would not disappear during testing. He
and his associates began adding various chemical groups to
the four carbon rings that serve as the backbone of a
steroid molecule. The desired stability was achieved by
adding a group called methyl-oxime, or MOX, to one site on
the molecule and another group called tri-methyl-silyl, or
TMS, to a second site. 

Now, a single sharp peak appeared when Compound X was sent
through the gas chromatograph, but the substance remained
unknown. Next, Dr. Catlin examined the drug's chemical
fingerprint, a pattern of fragmented particles produced by
bombardment in the mass spectrometer. These fragments
appear on a computer screen as lines in a kind of stick
diagram. Essentially, they are jumbled pieces of a
molecular puzzle. 

To know exactly what molecule they were dealing with, Dr.
Catlin and his team had to assemble these scattered pieces
into a coherent whole. The first step was to draw a
prospective molecule, the way sketch artists draw pictures
of suspected criminals. 

Dr. Hatton, the chemist, said of Dr. Catlin: "One of the
things I admire is that he's always had vision, hunches.
I've wanted to say many times he's crazy or paranoid, but
it turns out he's right." 

By July 1, two and a half weeks after receiving the sample
of the mystery substance, Dr. Catlin and his associates had
drawn such a prospective molecule. Next, they had to make a
batch of the drug, to see whether it matched Compound X.
Two days later, Dr. Catlin synthesized the steroid. It was
a match. 

The drug's formula of carbon, hydrogen and oxygen atoms
(C21H28O2) resembled two well-known steroids: gestrinone,
used therapeutically to treat gynecological problems, and
trenbolone, used by ranchers to beef up cattle. 

The scientists named the steroid tetrahydrogestrinone. Dr.
Catlin consulted a worldwide database to see whether anyone
else had synthesized THG or written about it. "Nothing came
up," Dr. Catlin said. 

He was dealing with a previously undetectable steroid. 

"I
had suspected this for years," Dr. Catlin said. "Suddenly,
we were confronted with proof." 

As part of a peer review, a second laboratory synthesized
THG. Now a test had to be devised to detect the steroid in
urine samples provided by athletes. Because THG could not
ethically be given to a human, a test was arranged to have
it injected into another primate, in this case a baboon.
Urine samples provided by the baboon over the course of
three or four days all showed the presence of the drug. 

Putting Theory Into Action 

By September, the laboratory
protocol was sufficiently refined to conduct a test for THG
in human urine samples. At the anti-doping organization's
request, Dr. Catlin's lab retested 550 refrigerated urine
samples. They had been provided at the United States track
and field championships three months earlier, collected in
out-of-competition tests or forwarded by the world
governing body of track and field. 

On Oct. 16, Terry Madden, chief executive of the United
States Anti-Doping Agency, announced the existence of THG,
saying that positive drug tests signaled a "conspiracy
involving chemists, coaches and certain athletes using what
they developed to be undetectable designer steroids to
defraud their fellow competitors and the American and world
public." 

In the past, some sports federations might have resisted a
retesting of urine samples. But the anti-doping
organization has controlled testing in the United States
since October 2000, and it was eager for another
examination. As accused athletes defend themselves, some
seem likely to challenge whether proper procedure was
followed before the urine samples were resealed after the
initial tests weeks earlier. 

"Clearly, it will be an issue," Mr. Williams, the lawyer
for Ms. Jacobs, said. 

Over the past 15 years, Dr. Catlin has grown by turn
encouraged and disheartened as he witnessed doping scandals
involving the Tour de France and the sprinter Ben Johnson
and observed the debate over the use of legal steroid
precursors by the former home run champion Mark McGwire. 

Dr. Catlin is bothered by a poisoned environment in which
remarkable performances bring immediate suspicion. "As
athletes move up and begin to win, everyone says they must
be on drugs," Dr. Catlin said. "That's grossly unfair." 

Yet he is also disturbed that no test exists to detect
human growth hormone, a substance that athletes are widely
believed to be using. 

Dr. Catlin's friends ask why he remains in such a messy
business, and he admits that he has wondered whether the
drug problem is unsolvable. He has considered getting out,
but he stays, convinced that most athletes do not cheat and
that the top levels of sport can be made clean. 

Scientists could confront designer steroids more
aggressively, he said, anticipating their use and devising
tests for them. But Dr. Catlin and other scientists say it
would take $50 million or more over the next five years to
address doping in sports adequately. It is uncertain
whether sports organizations and governments are willing to
pay. 

Even with more aggressive testing, scandals persist. 

"I'm
interested to see how sport responds," Dr. Catlin said. "If
it takes a deep, hard look at this, there could be
fundamental changes. I don't want to be finding another big
bust in five years. I'm fearful of that." 

http://www.nytimes.com/2003/11/02/sports/02STER.html?ex=1068775461&ei=1&en=93f27f1069417b3f


---------------------------------

Get Home Delivery of The New York Times Newspaper. Imagine
reading The New York Times any time & anywhere you like!
Leisurely catch up on events & expand your horizons. Enjoy
now for 50% off Home Delivery! Click here:

http://www.nytimes.com/ads/nytcirc/index.html



HOW TO ADVERTISE
---------------------------------
For information on advertising in e-mail newsletters 
or other creative advertising opportunities with The 
New York Times on the Web, please contact
[EMAIL PROTECTED] or visit our online media 
kit at http://www.nytimes.com/adinfo

For general information about NYTimes.com, write to 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]  

Copyright 2003 The New York Times Company

Reply via email to