By word count: either R.T or Eamon Condon.
malmo,
always striving for the elusive quarter-liner.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Ward Nicholson
> Sent: Sunday, September 03, 2000 6:33 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: t-and-f: Statistics on current posting
>
>
> It would be interesting to see word-count totals (sans embedded and quoted
> ">" material) as contrasted to number of postings per individual. Garry
> Hill's posts are often just one or two sentences, and also the recent
> "SURVIVOR" postings have skewed his "usual" output upward considerably, so
> the last week is not representative. (Malmo's pithy postings are even
> shorter, usually one-liners or even half-liners.) Most prolific poster by
> word count would likely be somebody different (from spots 2, 3, or 4?).
>
> --Ward Nicholson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>
> Pat Palmer wrote:
>
> > 1. [EMAIL PROTECTED] 58
> > 2. Conway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 14
> > 3. R.T. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 12
> > 4. Michael Rohl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 11
> ...
> >It seems that about 0.5% of the members provide 44% of the written
> >material. Without GH's amazing productivity (warming up for Olympic
> >writing?), the the percentage by the "top 10" (really 12 -- a
> >three-way tie) would drop to 32%.
>
>
>
