You are correct about the 70s. What's more telling though was that we didn't know that we were SUPPOSED to get injured more often, as the modern-day exercise-physio-nonsense-running-geeks would want us to believe. malmo . > > So back to the 70's! > > Is it me or did we see less injuries back then than now in > average runners? > > I have no stats to back that assertion/question up but maybe it's a good > topic to look at. > _______________________________________________________________________ > Jason Bunston > ICQ 22474747 > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://webhome.idirect.com/~jbunston > _______________________________________________________________________ > > >
- t-and-f: A new kind of shoe - to smash records FranciCash
- Re: t-and-f: A new kind of shoe - to smash recor... R.T.
- Re: t-and-f: A new kind of shoe - to smash r... Jason Michael Blank
- Re: t-and-f: A new kind of shoe - to sma... Ward Nicholson
- Re: t-and-f: A new kind of shoe - to smash r... Ward Nicholson
- Re: t-and-f: A new kind of shoe - to sma... P.F.Talbot
- Re: t-and-f: A new kind of shoe - to... Ward Nicholson
- Re: t-and-f: A new kind of shoe - to... Jason L Bunston
- RE: t-and-f: A new kind of shoe - to smash recor... Post, Marty
- RE: t-and-f: A new kind of shoe - to smash recor... RT
- RE: t-and-f: A new kind of shoe - to smash recor... Scott Jensen
- RE: t-and-f: A new kind of shoe - to smash recor... DLTFNedit