On Thu, 2 Nov 2000 12:25:20 -0600, you wrote: > > When linear extrapolation is extended over large ranges >the choice of dependent variable becomes important. In the >case of running records, plotting race time vs calendar >time eventually produces meaningless results as witness >below. It is better to take average speed as the dependent >variable. Then the achievement of zero elapsed time is >infinitely far off. Before anyone "breaks 00:00:00", Maybe we already achieved 00:00:00 and blew right by it without anybody noticing- I keep hearing stuff about negative splits :-) RT
- Corruption (was:Re: t-and-f: Not EVERYON... Elliott Oti
- RE: t-and-f: Not EVERYONE is doping Richard McCann
- RE: t-and-f: Not EVERYONE is doping malmo
- RE: t-and-f: Not EVERYONE is doping Richard McCann
- RE: t-and-f: Not EVERYONE is doping malmo
- RE: t-and-f: Not EVERYONE is do... Richard McCann
- RE: t-and-f: Not EVERYONE is doping malmo
- Re: t-and-f: Not EVERYONE is doping Buck Jones
- RE: t-and-f: Not EVERYONE is doping Mcewen, Brian T
- RE: t-and-f: Not EVERYONE is doping Dave Carey
- Re: t-and-f: Not EVERYONE is doping John Bale
- RE: t-and-f: Not EVERYONE is doping Justin Clouder
- RE: t-and-f: Not EVERYONE is doping Mcewen, Brian T
- RE: t-and-f: Not EVERYONE is doping Mcewen, Brian T
- t-and-f: Not EVERYONE is doping Mcewen, Brian T
- Re: t-and-f: Not EVERYONE is doping Dave Carey
- Re: t-and-f: Not EVERYONE is doping philip_ponebshek
