[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Not to put words in your both, but the logical extension of this argument is
that athletes should be scouring the streets looking for somebody who has
an epi ratio of something way over 6:1 and therefore get that threshold
raised. Or anticipating a hematocrit rule similar to cycling's 49%, find
somebodywho busts that, get them set as the standard.
gh
Completely separate. The epi ratio is already set at about 6 times the
normal limit. The RT is not anywhere near that extreme. So we allow for
possible variations in chemical imbalances, but not for the actual execution
of the event itself?
I do not need to go out in the street to find someone who can react somewhere
near or under .100. As stated, there were at least 2 .110 in Lisbon. And I
can tell you from experience that one of those is from a girl that has spent
the better part of 2 seasons improving that very aspect of her race.
What I do not get in this conversation, is the acceptance that man will run
faster, but he will not react faster? How do you come to that conclusion?
The logical extension of this whole debate is that we will never see man run,
jump, or throw any farther than what we have seen.
DGS
Faith is a road seldom traveled
