But Inger Miller is not a distance runner.
Ed
----- Original Message -----
From: "Dan Kaplan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, October 21, 2001 4:23 AM
Subject: Re: t-and-f: Athletes fighting their own battle on drugs


> I've mentioned from time to time that research of a few years back
> (Running Research News from around '95) suggested that legal levels of
> caffeine (the equivalent of up to 3 cups of coffee) could be quite
> beneficial to mid-distance and distance performances, while illegal levels
> (5+ cups) are actually detrimental to performance.
>
> I don't know if this has been looked into further or if it is accepted as
> fact, but it certainly raises questions as to the purpose of banning high
> levels of caffeine.  Last I checked, food makes you faster, but too much
> of it before a race slows you down...
>
> Dan
>
> --- Roger Ruth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I realize that it is aside from the main thrust of this article, and I
> > realize that my question may be naive, but why would it matter that an
> > athlete tests positive for caffiene? I can't see that consuming a dozen
> > cups of coffee or a dozen cans of cola per day provides any advantage in
> > muscle-building, stamina, or anything else relevant to athletic
> > performance.
> >
> > How does caffiene get into the list of proscribed substances?
>
> =====
> http://AccountBiller.com - MyCalendar, D-Man, ReSearch, etc.
> http://Run-Down.com - 10,000 Running Links, Free Contests...
> ------------------------------------------------------------
>   @    o   Dan Kaplan - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>  <|\/ <^-  ( [EMAIL PROTECTED] or [EMAIL PROTECTED] )
> _/ \ \/\   [EMAIL PROTECTED] (lifetime forwarding address)
>    /   /   (503)370-9969 phone/fax
>
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Make a great connection at Yahoo! Personals.
> http://personals.yahoo.com
>

Reply via email to