Martin wrote:
>>>Veering a bit here but the subject line made me think of it. There are
>>>some yahoos on letsrun that actually espouse the theory that the reason
>>>there was so much depth in distance in the early eighties is because the
>>>courses(and probably the tracks) were all short. Regards, Martin
Malmo added:
>The tracks were short, as well!
That must be it. I find the same thing - the courses I run today clearly
seem longer than when I ran them 20 years ago. Tracks do too - even though
in theory I know that most of them are longer, having been converted from
440 to 400...
Phil
