Once again the logic on this list has done for me. The owner is another story? Is that because he let these well fed dogs roam free? Or because he taught them to kill?
They are both the same story. The owner should be convicted of murder, the dogs should be destroyed (I understand that's one and the same thing in some States).
Pit bulls are essentially aggressive. They will attack – even the nice ones do that. Not for nothing are they banned in the UK under the Dangerous Dogs Act.
Randall Northam

On Thursday, Jan 16, 2003, at 19:42 Europe/London, Martin J. Dixon wrote:

With malmo on the dogs. Not their fault. The owner is another story.


Reply via email to