http://www.latimes.com/sports/la-sp-drugs8sep08,0,2080945.story?page=2&coll=la-headlines-sports

Dick Pound: "..reliable test..trickiness (for the lab is to) know what they are 
looking for...difference of opinion" ?????

Dick Pound is using subjectivity to determine innocents or guilt???? 

If the test is not 100 percent objective, why are we using it?



"Our sense is that it's a very reliable test," said Dick Pound, chairman of the 
World Anti-Doping Agency. "The trickiness is having enough experience in the 
particular lab that is conducting the test to know what they are seeing. You 
can get a difference of opinion."



"Allen Murray, an Irvine biochemist, told the Chicago Tribune that he reviewed 
Jones' "A" result and witnessed the testing of the "B" sample on her behalf. He 
said the initial positive result should have been thrown out because of 
unanswerable questions about the data it contained."



"Ungerleider, while suggesting that testers continue to police EPO use, called 
it a "reality check."

"The technology is there," he said. "But there are mistakes that can be made."

Reply via email to