Hi, On Sunday 01 April 2007 00:44:45 Arto Bendiken wrote: > Hi, > > I'm attempting to build my first embedded T2 target from the trunk, > but got this error on binutils (see attachment). Apparently the > binutils-100-uclibc-conf.patch no longer cleanly applies.
Yes, this is a already known regression from a recent binutils update. You can temporarily downdate it: Index: package/base/binutils/binutils.desc =================================================================== --- package/base/binutils/binutils.desc (revision 23334) +++ package/base/binutils/binutils.desc (working copy) @@ -39,7 +39,7 @@ [L] GPL [S] Stable -[V] 2.17.50.0.14 +[V] 2.17.50.0.12 [P] X 012--5---9 102.100 -[D] 3068100262 binutils-2.17.50.0.14.tar.bz2 ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/devel/binutils/ +[D] 4220655470 binutils-2.17.50.0.12.tar.bz2 ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/devel/binutils/ We are looking for a sollution. > How unstable is the trunk at the moment, in general? Would a T2 newbie > like me be better off just sticking with the 6.0 branch for the time > being? T2 trunk usually is pretty fine, though such regressions happen from time to time. For a first contact and production use of course branches/6.0 is recommended. Yours, -- René Rebe - ExactCODE GmbH - Europe, Germany, Berlin http://exactcode.de | http://t2-project.org | http://rene.rebe.name +49 (0)30 / 255 897 45
----------------------------------------------------------- If you wish to unsubscribe from this mailing, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of: unsubscribe t2
