Hi all,
Rene Rebe wrote:
Hi,
Marian Aldenhövel wrote:
Hi,
(Maybe it even already builds with this wchar chunk removed, I
have not yet tried.)
No. At least gcc-200-* has something else that fails, I did not test
further as I was not really sure I had not done something stupid
breaking it myself.
Patches for the uClibC adaption are welcome, I might find the
time to fix it soon otherwise.
I could look into it and isolate the chunks that do not apply. I think
I am up to that. Anything else like finding out _why_ it does not apply
and checking where the fix has to go instead, or whether it is still
needed at all, I doubt I am qualified.
Ah yes, there was more obsolete than I guess from the quick look
over your e-mail.
I think I can commit a working patchset in the next hours. The
gcc cross compiler for uclibc already built, I'm waiting for the
cross build gcc and some more packages before I commit the re-
diffed uclibc/gcc patches.
Committed revision 29697.
My 486/minimal/uclibc test-build already finsihed 60
build steps, including the cross build gcc, including
STL, itself:
Error logs from minimal-uclibc-8.0-trunk-generic-x86-i486:
239 builds total, 60 completed fine, 0 with errors, 179 to go
I cross my fingers :-)
--
René Rebe - ExactCODE GmbH - Europe, Germany, Berlin
http://exactcode.de | http://t2-project.org | http://rene.rebe.name
-----------------------------------------------------------
If you wish to unsubscribe from this mailing, send mail to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of: unsubscribe t2
