Thanks René, I think there still might be one patch left behind for other package with similar problem.
Cheers, Aldas On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 8:11 AM, René Rebe <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi, > > Aldas Nabazas wrote: > >> Hi Martin, >> >> This is strange but cvs compiles for me on trunk. How can this be >> reproduced? >> > > Just failed here (for the first time) during a to-x86-64 cross build, too . > Maybe it only failed on certain configure configrations, ... > > Committed revision 34491. > > Thanks, >> Aldas >> >> On Sun, Aug 30, 2009 at 10:22 AM, Martin Papadopoulos <[email protected] >> >wrote: >> >> diff -ur .1/cvs-1.11.23/lib/getline.c .2/cvs-1.11.23/lib/getline.c >>> --- cvs-1.11.23/lib/getline.c 2009-08-29 23:44:17.202448640 +0200 >>> +++ cvs-1.11.23/lib/getline.c 2009-08-29 23:41:42.000000000 +0200 >>> @@ -155,7 +155,7 @@ >>> } >>> >>> int >>> -getline (lineptr, n, stream) >>> +my_getline (lineptr, n, stream) >>> char **lineptr; >>> size_t *n; >>> FILE *stream; >>> diff -ur .1/cvs-1.11.23/lib/getline.h .2/cvs-1.11.23/lib/getline.h >>> --- cvs-1.11.23/lib/getline.h 2009-08-29 23:44:07.426330066 +0200 >>> +++ cvs-1.11.23/lib/getline.h 2009-08-29 23:38:25.000000000 +0200 >>> @@ -12,7 +12,7 @@ >>> #define GETLINE_NO_LIMIT -1 >>> >>> int >>> - getline __PROTO ((char **_lineptr, size_t *_n, FILE *_stream)); >>> + my_getline __PROTO ((char **_lineptr, size_t *_n, FILE *_stream)); >>> int >>> getline_safe __PROTO ((char **_lineptr, size_t *_n, FILE *_stream, >>> int limit)); >>> >>> >>> >>> ----------------------------------------------------------- >>> If you wish to unsubscribe from this mailing, send mail to >>> [email protected] with a subject of: unsubscribe t2 >>> >>> >> > > > -- > René Rebe, ExactCODE GmbH, Jaegerstr. 67, DE-10117 Berlin > http://exactcode.com | http://t2-project.org | http://rene.rebe.name >
----------------------------------------------------------- If you wish to unsubscribe from this mailing, send mail to [email protected] with a subject of: unsubscribe t2
